PTM Viewer PTM Viewer

Seed phosphorylation

Phosphorylation in Arabidopsis thaliana

16 modifications in 16 peptides, found in 29 proteins

Experiment Details

Exp 21


Experimental Setup
TissueSeed
ConditionControl
PTM EnrichmentAlOH3
MS InstrumentLTQ
MS/MS Search Parameters
Protein Database TAIR ftp://ftp.plantbiology.msu.edu/pub/data/Eukaryotic_Projects/o_sativa/ ftp://ftp.plantbiology
FDR ThresholdXcorr thresholds and manual inspection
Search Algorithm(s)SEQUEST
ProteaseTrypsin
Variable ModificationsPhosphorylation (STY)
Other Information
Comments Phosphat 4.0 - Defined sites (pS/T/Y)


Publication Information

Wolschin et al., 2005

PubMed ID: 16270910

No external accession available

Abstract

Plant Methods. 2005 Nov 1;1(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-1-9.

Combining metal oxide affinity chromatography (MOAC) and selective mass 
spectrometry for robust identification of in vivo protein phosphorylation sites.

Wolschin F(1), Weckwerth W.

Author information:
(1)Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14424 Potsdam, Germany. 
weckwerth@mpimp-golm.mpg.de

BACKGROUND: Protein phosphorylation is accepted as a major regulatory pathway in 
plants. More than 1000 protein kinases are predicted in the Arabidopsis 
proteome, however, only a few studies look systematically for in vivo protein 
phosphorylation sites. Owing to the low stoichiometry and low abundance of 
phosphorylated proteins, phosphorylation site identification using mass 
spectrometry imposes difficulties. Moreover, the often observed poor quality of 
mass spectra derived from phosphopeptides results frequently in uncertain 
database hits. Thus, several lines of evidence have to be combined for a precise 
phosphorylation site identification strategy.
RESULTS: Here, a strategy is presented that combines enrichment of 
phosphoproteins using a technique termed metaloxide affinity chromatography 
(MOAC) and selective ion trap mass spectrometry. The complete approach involves 
(i) enrichment of proteins with low phosphorylation stoichiometry out of complex 
mixtures using MOAC, (ii) gel separation and detection of phosphorylation using 
specific fluorescence staining (confirmation of enrichment), (iii) 
identification of phosphoprotein candidates out of the SDS-PAGE using liquid 
chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, and (iv) identification of 
phosphorylation sites of these enriched proteins using automatic detection of 
H3PO4 neutral loss peaks and data-dependent MS3-fragmentation of the 
corresponding MS2-fragment. The utility of this approach is demonstrated by the 
identification of phosphorylation sites in Arabidopsis thaliana seed proteins. 
Regulatory importance of the identified sites is indicated by conservation of 
the detected sites in gene families such as ribosomal proteins and sterol 
dehydrogenases. To demonstrate further the wide applicability of MOAC, 
phosphoproteins were enriched from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cell cultures.
CONCLUSION: A novel phosphoprotein enrichment procedure MOAC was applied to seed 
proteins of A. thaliana and to proteins extracted from C. reinhardtii. Thus, the 
method can easily be adapted to suit the sample of interest since it is 
inexpensive and the components needed are widely available. Reproducibility of 
the approach was tested by monitoring phosphorylation sites on specific proteins 
from seeds and C. reinhardtii in duplicate experiments. The whole process is 
proposed as a strategy adaptable to other plant tissues providing high 
confidence in the identification of phosphoproteins and their corresponding 
phosphorylation sites.

DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-1-9
PMCID: PMC1295590
PMID: 16270910